|
Transformism:
Novel
Forms and New Materialities
Melanie
Jackson
a.
There
is an excitement around Synthetic Biology, with its aspiration
to make endless new forms infinitely possible. Synthetic biology
sets out to create new life to understand what already is, and
develop the capacity to re-programme it to create forms and functions
that cannot be found in nature, and to improve what can be. With
an engineering approach to biology, it extends our taxonomies
of the animate and inanimate, of the sentient and the inorganic
and folds them in new ways. It dreams up complex systems such
as gourds that can be programmed to grow into fully-fledged houses,
windows that create energy as they let in light through photosynthesis,
drains that convert waste into energy, trees that can form useful
structures such as bridges or towers, bio-robots that seek out
pests such as flies, snails and rats to convert their bodies into
sustainable bio-electricity, new foods that have a subtractive
calorific content, bacterial coatings that transform pollutants
and CO2 into armorial masques healing concrete cracks, bio-sensors
that glow, or change colour with the contamination of undesirable
presences. It wants materials to be smart, responsive, full of
switches, choices, thoughtfulness – it can think itself
evolutionary and revolutionary.
With
this giddy wish-list of future applications so generates an ever-expanding
glossary to articulate its actions and desires, along with a host
of new nouns to describe its agents. Like its very methods of
re-modelling existing living parts to do new work, it appropriates
terms and language to accommodate its new modus. For instance,
for when things get too complex, when the minutiae of detail too
long to recall - it creates abstractions and abstraction hierarchies.
These are ‘black boxed’ ideas, units, or substrates:
blocks of pre-calculated acted upon matter that can perform a
specific function. They don’t need explanation or extrapolation,
just ready implementation, like a circuit or section of code.
They can be synthetically replicated and used as building blocks
of known functionality. Though synthetic biology applies an enlightenment
engineering logic and pragmatism to its methodology and its terminology,
it is suffused with the musings pursued in folktale and mythology:
to make giant, fecund, to shapeshift, and transform. It premises
itself on empirical systems and standardized parts, and incants
the language of engineering, electronics and programming code
to living systems. However, when the narrative is articulated
in terms of its aspirations and applications, the story chimes
with the realm of the magical, of the sacred, the mythical. Many
of its storylines are recited by those who read from a trajectory
of an evolutionary technology, from the written word to the printing
press to a synthetically programmed future. They take the speaking
position of what Donna Haraway names the modest witness, the
legitimate
and authorized ventriloquist for the object world,
adding nothing from his mere opinions, from his biasing
embodiment… He bears witness: he is objective;
he guarantees the clarity and purity of objects. His
subjectivity is his objectivity. His narratives have
a magical power - they lose all trace of their history
as stories, as products of partisan projects, as contestable
representations, or as constructed documents in their
potent capacity to define the facts. The narratives
become clear mirrors, fully magical mirrors, without
once appealing to the transcendental or the magical
(1)
|
The
visionaries of synthetic biology fear that intellectual progress
could be hampered by uninformed objection, and that public resistance
is essentially an irrational response to the progression of thought
by those haunted by ghoulishness, unable to cope with the potential
of taxonomical reconfiguration. Capitalism also presents a façade
of logic and naturalised inevitability, despite it's suffusion
with mythologising and fantasy. If we recognise the genre of the
storytelling around synthetic biology as science fiction rather
than a naturalised evolutionary timeline - we can recognise it
as a revolutionary technology, a technology that we are scripting
rather than an inevitable unfolding. We have of course always
used tools and technologies to transcend and extend our own physical
and imaginative boundaries, and incantations of expansion and
transcendence can lead us to different narrative outcomes. We
all use stories to understand science – even though scientists
may not always acknowledge that they are engaged in an act of
storytelling. Can synthetic biology trigger a discourse that recognises
mythopoesis - the power of stories to create as well as describe
reality? Will these new 'superfolds' of mindfulness and matter,
of the human, and non-human – the organic and inorganic
offer radical new formulations of subjectivity, new modes of being?
Could Haraway’s own cyborgs find space to configure within
this new science? Might it instead simply invite capitalism and
militarism to extend it’s grasp to the life of the cell
and beyond, instrumentalising commodified and alienated subjectivities
at the scale of the infinitesimal?
Synthetic
biology shares an imperative with nanotechnology, they are close
disciplines projected to converge. They take raw material –
whether they be genes or atoms - and manipulate them at the nanoscale
(a billionth of a metre), to project their behaviours outwards
into manifold new dimensions.
In
the nanoworld, nature can be harnessed anew as a force
of production. The self-organising abilities of DNA
are mobilised in nanomachines. All that frenetic activity
of bacterial self-replication, molecular self-assembly
and self-organisation, biological stimulus and response
systems and viral architecture rebadges nanoscale
and mesoscopic elements - enzymes, nucleic acids,
ribosomes, chloroplasts, mitochondrions, flagella
and the like - as a new working class, grafting away
inside living cells, constructing, reconstructing,
destroying, clearing, cleaning, sweeping, accelerating,
bending, twisting, rotating, operating, shooting,
combining (2).
|
Though
much of the work of synthetic biology takes place in the realm
of the digital, modeling, calculating, projecting outwards –
the 'wet' work remains visceral and embodied in ritual and methodical
physical process. Much work in synthetic biology requires a ‘chassis‘
– a substrate on which gene transfer, synthesis and replication
can take place. This is often e-coli – profuse in the gut
and one of the most populous bacteria on earth – and in
the popular imagination, a deathly infection. To create new organisms
with re-scripted ATCG genetic data, strands of DNA are combined
with e-coli – by processes of heat shocking, centrifuge,
streaking, incubation, scraping, electrification, inoculation
with anti-biotic, feeding with broth, cloning, amplification,
ligation and transformation (3).
This harbouring of work, embodied states, making use of entropy
and of replication takes us to the very core of where the narrative
arcs might project into the future. There is an opening here of
the boundaries through and between objects, signs, bodies, nonhuman
and human events, thoughtfulness and matter, production, exchange,
entropy. These new entanglements are however of human initiative,
they will be developed within political economies, and the spectres
of salvation and extinction hover around them.
One
of leading arguments for us to fully embrace synthetic biology
with light touch regulation and a well funded future is its potential
to ameliorate industrial over-production. We aspire to do this
by coercion of nature at the nanoscale, by directing its own tendency
to produce, replicate and self assemble, in tasks that compensate
for our own disastrously flawed relation to work and production.
We intend to set it to work to detect and deliver targeted drugs
to cancers, (many themselves caused by industrial excess), re-balance
atmospheres, grow plants that can thrive in exhausted soils, tackle
obesity and eating disorders, malnutrition, create new forms of
energy, turn base matter and waste into new forces of production.
It is the voice that is the most dominant, along with the whispered
incantation of the new term the genetic economy. This narrative
does not necessitate us to rethink the nature of the productivism
that is causing crisis, but applies a (patentable) intelligence
to localized problems. It could promise a new relationship with
objects, with entropy and corporeality, production and excess
- but it does not require us to reconsider our relationship with
obsolescence. It could extend the trajectory of generating novel
forms to support current patterns of consumption.
Though
synthetic biology is born out of symbiosis of the material and
the theoretical and is opens up new ways of thinking dynamically
about these relations, for others the shrinking of scale offers
a potential dissolution of the biological and material altogether.
Some avatars of technological singularity embrace the idea that
technology will soon bring about a greater-than-human intelligence,
and a greater than human chassis for this intelligence. Like Plato’s
realm of pure forms that disavows hair and dirt, the body itself
could be jettisoned for a purer, more ethereal substrate. There
is a sense that biology and entropy interrupt rather than catalyse
the ecstacy of consciousness, a divine submission to disembodiment
of thought:
If
we radically upgrade our bodies with biotech, we
might find that in addition to augmenting our biological
capabilities, we’re also going to be replacing
more of our biology with non-biological components,
so that things are backed up and decentralized and
not subject to entropy. More and more of the data
processing that makes up our consciousness is going
to be non-biological, and eventually we might be
able to discard biology altogether, because we’ll
have finally invented a computational substrate
that supports the human mind. At that point,
if we’re doing computing at the nano scale,
or the femto scale, which is even smaller, you could
see extraordinary things… What if we could
store all of the computing capacity of the world’s
computer networks in something that operates at
the femto scale? What if we could have thinking,
dreaming, conscious minds operating at the femto
scale? That would be a substrate independent mind.
You can even go beyond that. John Smart has this
really interesting idea he calls the Transcension
Hypothesis. It’s this idea that that all civilizations
hit a technological singularity, after which they
stop expanding outwards, and instead become subject
to STEM compression that pushes them inward into
denser and denser computational states until eventually
we disappear out of the visible universe, and we
enter into a black-hole-like condition (4).
|
In
late February of 1692, The Reverend Samuel Parris called a doctor
to come to the aid of his daughter, Betty, and to his eleven-year-old
niece, Abigail both of whom were suffering from spontaneous fits.
Tituba, a slave in the household was blamed for introducing the
girls to witchcraft, and subsequently her story too has been subject
to metamorphosis. It has changed form and significance across
time, religious, ethical and political value systems. Her ethnicity
has been described variously including Arawak Indian, Indian,
half-Indian, Black African, Caribbean, half Caribbean, half White.
Though her confession in the written court record is to an entirely
European notion of witchcraft she is connected in posthumously
published historical accounts to telling voodoo stories, practicing
voodoo rites, sparking hysteria and a spate of further trials.
She has been attributed with various forms of magical agency from
shapeshifting to sorcery, fortune telling to divination. She has
been a concubine, a wife, a singleton, a mother, a victim of physical
violence, executed, accused and exonerated. She disappeared from
the historical record, to reappear in countless subsequent fictive
and analytical re-formulations. In Sneha Solanki’s work
Super-natural it is not the artist or the scientist that is identified
with witchcraft or magical transformation, but the organism they
have synthesized together. Tituba is given agency as a biological
physical entity, classified, categorized - and, just like her
historical counterpart, utterly prone to further acts of metamorphosis.
Morphology
is linked to Morpheus, the God of dreams, who shapes
and reshapes himself and our worlds of reverie. Morpheus
sends human forms into dreams. His brother Phobetos
made the plants dream. The third son of Hypnos, named
Phantasos, made the stones and other inanimate objects
dream- and the dream elements over which he presided
were the most unreal, tricky, fantastical. Dreams
can adopt any form, any shape. Dreams are infinite
forms. Morphology is the imagination of infinite variety.
Morpheus sleeps in a dark cave lined with poppies.
Does dream dream itself? Does matter form itself?
Proteus the sea god also had the ability to foretell
the future. He adopted different shapes in order to
avoid revealing what was to come. He would only divine
for those who could capture him (5). |
Image
a.
Towards A New Working Class: A Wander Through The Nanoscene. Melanie
Jackson 2012.
References
(1)
Donna J. Haraway, Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. The Haraway
Reader. Routledge, New York and London, 2003. pp 224.
(2)
From The Urpflanze (Part 2) Melanie Jackson and Esther Leslie,
2013.
(3)
Super-natural, Sneha Solanki, 2012.
(4) Jason Silva, A Timothy Leary
for the Viral Video Age, Ross Andersen. The Atlantic, April 12
2012. http://www.theatlantic.com/
(5)
From The Urpflanze (Part 2) Melanie Jackson and Esther Leslie,
2013.
•
Arthur C. Clarke, 'any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable
from magic'.
•
John Cussans, http://codeless88.wordpress.com/
•
Gilles Deleuze, Foucault, trans. Sean Hand. University of Minnesota
Press, Minneapolis,1988.
•
Chadwick Hansen. The Metamorphosis of Tituba, or Why American
Intellectuals Can't Tell an Indian Witch from a Negro. The New
England Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1 (March 1974), pp. 3-12.
•
Donna J. Haraway, A cyborg Manifesto. Science Technology, and
Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians,
Cyborgs and Women: Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, New York
and London, 1991, pp.149-181.
•
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Synthetic Biology Applying Engineering to
Biology, Report of a NEST High-Level Expert Group.
|
|
|